Monday, November 08, 2004

Whuh!?!?

Read This and get irritated.

"We need to work really hard at reclaiming some language," said the Rev. Robert Edgar, general secretary of the liberal-leaning National Council of Churches.

"The religious right has successfully gotten out there shaping personal piety issues — civil unions, abortion — as almost the total content of 'moral values,'" Edgar said. "And yet you can't read the Old Testament without knowing God was concerned about the environment, war and peace, poverty. God doesn't want 45 million Americans without health care."


True. God would be concerned about people paying for steep medical procedures they can't afford, He's personal like that...but I would think he would rather have you put your faith in Him, then an insurance plan. And I would bet a million dollars, that the Good Lord would rather us stop the Genocide of the Innocent, then use recycled toilet paper.

"One thing Jesus was absolutely clear about was helping the poor, and the welcoming of strangers," Bouman said. "Maybe this election was a wake-up call to have a serious conversation about what morality means, to look at what sort of country we're becoming."

Mark 14, "While he was in Bethany, reclining at the table in the home of a man known as Simon the Leper, a woman came with an alabaster jar of very expensive perfume, made of pure nard. She broke the jar and poured the perfume on his head. Some of those present were saying indignantly to one another, "Why this waste of perfume? It could have been sold for more than a year's wages and the money given to the poor." And they rebuked her harshly.

"Leave her alone," said Jesus. "Why are you bothering her? She has done a beautiful thing to me. The poor you will always have with you, and you can help them any time you want. But you will not always have me.

I don't think Jesus had his priorities screwed up, do you? Therefore, I don't think he would blame us for first fighting against Genocide of the Innocent before we take care of the poor.

Proponents of same-sex unions, for example, believe it is moral to afford partnership rights to two men or two women who have committed themselves to each other and, in many cases, are raising children.

"We have a thing or two to say about the 'moral values' involved with permitting a couple who wish to build a life together to enjoy full legal standing as a family," said Ron Schlittler, director of Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays.

Similarly, abortion-rights advocates believe it is moral to allow the option of abortion to a poor, newly pregnant woman, rather than compel her to bear a child she didn't plan for and cannot afford to raise.


Have you ever heard such CRAP in your life!?!? Let's face it...as long as so called "Moral Values" are a leading decision maker...the Liberals don't have a leg to stand on. They just don't get it.

I have an idea for the poor, newly pregnant woman who didn't plan for and cannot afford to raise a child...DON'T HAVE SEX!!! If you are so morally loose that you absolutely, unequivocally, must get your rocks off...there are plenty of organizations that will give you preventive birth control in the form of Pills, Shots, Patches, Sponges and Condoms, FOR FREE!!! Imagine that!!! Then you can boink until your horny little heart is content, with out MURDER being one of the many consequences you're guaranteed to accrue by being so ignorant.

Then again, if you're this morally loose with your private parts, I suppose you need some big "Moral" Liberal, to be "Moral" for you, and do the "Moral" thing and allow you to kill your baby...since these same "Moral" people also practice a good bit of Eliteism...See, they know what's better for you than you do. Oh, and they won't have to deal with that hole Guilt and Disgust you're going to feel deep within your soul after you realize you just murdered a child because you just had to get your rocks off.

Man...Liberals irritate me.
Good Night,
K~

Comments: Post a Comment

<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?